Google has issued a response to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) proposal to forcibly separate the company from its Chrome browser and potentially the Android platform. The company expressed strong objections, highlighting the broader implications of such a move.
Concerns Over Security, Innovation, and Consumer Access
Google noted that the DOJ could have addressed its concerns by targeting the alleged issue directly, such as terminating contracts that make Google the default search engine on Apple devices, Mozilla Firefox, and other platforms. Instead, the DOJ chose what Google describes as a “radical interventionist program,” which the company claims will harm consumers, disrupt technology, and weaken America’s global tech leadership.
Key risks outlined by Google include:
- Privacy Threats: Forcibly divesting Chrome and Android could jeopardize the security and privacy of millions of users.
- Data Disclosure Risks: Google may be required to share proprietary innovations, search data, and users’ personal queries with numerous companies.
- AI Development Setbacks: Investment in artificial intelligence, where Google is a leader, could be significantly reduced.
- Impact on Firefox: Projects like Mozilla Firefox, reliant on search agreements with Google, may suffer severe consequences.
- Access Restrictions: Access to Google’s search services might be deliberately limited for users.
Increased Government Control Raises Concerns
Google also criticized the DOJ’s plan to establish a “Technical Committee” with authority over the design and operation of Google’s search services, adds NIX Solutions. This includes mandates such as requiring two selection screens on devices like Pixel phones before accessing search. The company emphasized that such measures would expand government control to unprecedented levels.
Google reiterated that its search engine is recognized as the industry’s best, trusted by millions daily. It warned that the DOJ’s proposals could harm consumers, developers, and small businesses while threatening U.S. economic and technological leadership. We’ll keep you updated as this situation evolves.